2022 Global 100 Press Release

Media Release

Toronto, Canada, January 19, 2022 – Corporate Knights’ 18th annual ranking of the world’s 100 most sustainable corporations shows a continued correlation between higher investor returns and strong performance on key environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics. It also sheds light on the evolution of ESG priorities and outcomes, and on the extent of the gap between leading sustainability performers and their global corporate peers.

The ranking is based on a rigorous assessment of 6,914 companies with more than US$1 billion in revenues, out of which Vestas Wind Systems of Denmark emerged as the world’s most sustainable corporation. 

Vestas has evolved from hydraulic crane production into the largest of all wind turbine manufacturers, responsible for nearly one-fifth of global installed wind power capacity. In December it began work on a North Sea turbine that will be Europe’s most powerful and Scotland’s largest renewable energy project. The company’s current focus is on lowering the carbon footprint associated with its turbines.

“Through our solutions, Vestas supports the global energy system with avoiding millions of tonnes of carbon emissions every year,” says CEO Henrik Andersen. “To build a truly sustainable future, however, we must do more,” he adds.

According to analysis by S&P Capital IQ, the Corporate Knights Global 100 Index is the best performing global sustainability equity index since its inception in 2005and is also ahead of its blue-chip benchmark.  A dollar invested in an index composed of Global 100 companies on February 1, 2005, would have generated a return nearly one-fifth larger than the same investment in the MSCI All Country World Index, or ACWI (total return of 331% compared to 279%), with the performance gap widening in favour of the Global 100 markedly after the onset of COVID as large green recovery programs were adopted.  

The 2022 Global 100 companies derive 47% of their earnings from products or services categorized as “clean” under the Corporate Knights Clean Taxonomy, and they direct 48% of their capital expenditures, R&D and acquisitions to clean investments. 

Compared to the average ACWI firm, Global 100 members generate more than four times as much revenue per tonne of carbon emitted and almost eight times more output per unit of energy consumed.

“Strong performance on these metrics is foundational to achieving a clean and carbon-neutral economy in the necessary time frame,” says Corporate Knights CEO Toby Heaps, “and the sustained momentum is encouraging.”

While Global 100 companies made progress boosting their share of clean revenues and investments, non-male representation among directors stalled this year at 32%. And there was middling performance on percent of taxes paid, with cash taxes paid being 13% of profit ratio over the past five years, in contrast to average global statutory rates that are double that. This suggests that room remains for leading performers to emerge on some of these more recent ESG focal points.

Other noteworthy findings and outcomes of this year’s analysis:

• Circularity is a heightened focal point for many Global 100 companies, such as newly ranked Schnitzer Steel Industries of the United States, which specializes in steel and auto recycling.
• 65 of the Global 100 companies have signed up to the Science Based Targets initiative, aligning their emissions reductions with the requirements of the Paris Agreement, up from 60 in 2021. 
• Some companies dropped off the Global 100 in light of performance that no longer aligns with stricter criteria for what qualifies as “clean.” For example, cars must be fully electric now to qualify, whereas in prior years, hybrids were counted as clean. This had a negative impact on Valeo SA of France, whose products largely go into hybrid rather than battery electric vehicles.
• Some high-profile brands were excluded because of specific red-flagged activities. This includes climate-policy blocking on the part of Ford Motor Company, Daimler AG, Chevron and Air France, based on research from the non-profit Influence Map. 
• Sectoral representation is dominated by various tech segments, including telecoms, chipmakers, computer makers and business service providers, while 10 banks make up the largest single sector.
• The U.S. has the largest number of Global 100 companies at 23, with Canada punching above its weight with 13. Another three come from South America, 41 from Europe/U.K., and 20 from the Asia-Pacific Region.

Normally announced at an event concurrent with the World Economic Forum in Davos, this year’s Global 100 launch includes a leaders’ roundtable discussion held virtually, focusing on the imperative for businesses and governments to close the “say–do” gap on climate. This event takes place today from 4 to 5pm Central European Time with opening remarks from Johan Rockström, a Swedish professor and joint director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, and the involvement of:

• Henrik Andersen, CEO, Vestas Wind Systems A/S
• Jean-Pascal Tricoire, CEO, Schneider Electric SE
• Mads Nipper, CEO, Ørsted A/S
• Esther An, Chief Sustainability Officer, City Developments Limited
• Hakan Bulgurlu, CEO, Arçelik AS
• Lawrence Kurzius, CEO, McCormick & Company Inc. 
• Roberto Guidetti, CEO, Vitasoy International Holdings Ltd.

Free registration is available at https://tinyurl.com/G1002022. 

A digital version of the ranking, select national scorecards, and further contextual and methodological information is available at corporateknights.com/global100.

 

What is the Global 100? Corporate Knights’ ranking of the world’s 100 most sustainable corporations is based on a rigorous assessment of nearly 7,000 public companies with revenue over US$1 billion. The Corporate Knights Global 100 methodology strives to measure what matters and our methodology is transparent and verifiable. We’ve been conducting rigorous research on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors for two decades. Our ESG indicators are radically transparent, enabling a clear understanding of our ratings.

Our analysis illuminates the “say–do” gap. Thousands of companies have made net-zero commitments, but only a small percentage have credible, science-based plans to decarbonize their operations and supply chains. By researching companies’ capital expenditures, income earned from clearly defined sustainable activities, research and development/implementation of innovative low-carbon technologies, and mergers and acquisitions, we’re able to determine if they are aligning their money with their public relations. Only those companies making sustainable solutions a core part of their business offerings and allocating meaningful investments to reduce their carbon footprints make the grade.

The Global 100 is the top-performing global sustainability index. The index has consistently outperformed the MSCI ACWI since its inception, and the gap has widened significantly since we’ve allocated 50% of our grade to how companies make and invest their money, with particular emphasis on those closing the say–do gap on decarbonization. Our methodology measures what matters:  sustainability. 

Global 100 Methodology: All companies are scored on applicable metrics relative to their peers, with 50% of the weight assigned to Clean Revenue and Clean Investment. Nine of the indicators have fixed weights; the rest are assigned weights according to each industry’s relative and total impact in relation to the overall economy. After quantitatively analyzing data for 23 key performance indicators, this year’s overall scores were converted to letter grades.

About Corporate Knights: Corporate Knights Inc. includes the sustainable-business magazine Corporate Knights and a research division that produces rankings and financial product ratings based on corporate sustainability performance. 

Contact information:

Toby Heaps, CEO, Corporate Knights

Phone: +1 (416) 274.1432 Email: toby@corporateknights.com

 

Appendix I: Net returns of the MSCI ACWI and the Corporate Knights Global 100 Index in USD as calculated respectively by Solactive and S&P Capital IQ (from February 1, 2005, to December 31, 2021). 

Appendix II: 2022 Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations in the World

2022 G100 Rank	2021 G100 Rank	Company	Headquarters City	Climate commitments	Overall Score
1	21	Vestas Wind Systems A/S	Aarhus	1.5°C, SBTi	A+
2	24	Chr Hansen Holding A/S	Horsholm	1.5°C, SBTi	A
3	43	Autodesk Inc	San Rafael	SBTi	A
4	1	Schneider Electric SE	Rueil-Malmaison	1.5°C, SBTi	A
5	40	City Developments Ltd	Singapore	1.5°C, SBTi	A
6	9	American Water Works Company Inc	Camden (U.S.)		A
7	2	Orsted A/S	Fredericia	1.5°C, SBTi	A-
8	12	Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure PLC	Brentford (U.K.)	SBTi	A-
9	55	Dassault Systemes SE	Vélizy-Villacoublay	1.5°C, SBTi	A-
10	18	Brambles Ltd	Sydney	1.5°C, SBTi	A-
11	57	Sims Ltd	Mascot		A-
12	38	Johnson Controls International PLC	Cork	1.5°C, SBTi	B+
12*	7	Kering SA	Paris	SBTi, FCCA	B+
13	93	Koninklijke KPN NV	Rotterdam	1.5°C, SBTi	B+
14	6	McCormick & Company Inc	Hunt Valley	SBTi	B+
15		Schnitzer Steel Industries Inc	Portland		B+
16	45	Transcontinental Inc	Montreal		B+
17	5	Stantec Inc	Edmonton	1.5°C, SBTi	B+
18	17	Cascades Inc	Kingsey Falls	SBTi	B+
19		Evoqua Water Technologies Corp	Pittsburgh	SBTi	B+
20		Beijing Enterprises Water Group Ltd	Wan Chai		B+
21	3	Banco do Brasil SA	Brasília	1.5°C, SBTi	B+
22	51	Sekisui Chemical Co Ltd	Osaka	1.5°C, SBTi	B+
23		Engie Brasil Energia SA	Florianópolis		B+
24	4	Neste Oyj	Espoo		B+
25	19	Iberdrola SA	Bilbao	1.5°C, SBTi	B+
26	70	Xerox Holdings Corp	Norwalk	SBTi	B
27		Salesforce.Com Inc	San Francisco	1.5°C, SBTi	B
28	13	Cisco Systems Inc	San Jose	1.5°C, SBTi	B
29	39	Alstom SA	St Ouen	SBTi	B
31†		Legrand SA	Limoges	1.5°C, SBTi	B
32	16	Eisai Co Ltd	Tokyo	1.5°C, SBTi	B
33		Ecolab Inc	Saint Paul	1.5°C, SBTi	B
34		Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd	Calgary	SBTi	B
35	36	Novozymes A/S	Bagsvaerd	1.5°C, SBTi	B
36	90	Alphabet Inc	Mountain View		B-
37	27	Verbund AG	Vienna		B-
38	95	Workday Inc	Pleasanton	1.5°C, SBTi	B-
39		SunPower Corp	San Jose		B-
40	8	Metso Outotec Corp	Helsinki	SBTi	B-
41	29	IGM Financial Inc	Winnipeg	NZAM	B-
42		Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd	Wuhu		B-
43		Sprouts Farmers Market Inc	Phoenix		B-
44	20	TSMC	Hsinchu City		B-
45	62	Vitasoy International Holdings Ltd	Hong Kong SAR		B-
46	60	Samsung SDI Co Ltd	Yongin-Si		B-
47		LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd	Xi'an	1.5°C, SBTi	B-
48		Apple Inc	Cupertino	1.5°C, SBTi	B-
49	54	Telus Corp	Vancouver	1.5°C, SBTi	B-
50	50	HP Inc	Palo Alto	1.5°C, SBTi	B-
51		Atea ASA	Oslo	SBTi	B-
52	97	Tesla Inc	Austin	1.5°C, SBTi	B-
53	41	Konica Minolta Inc	Tokyo	SBTi	B-
54	30	Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co	Houston	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
55	84	SAP SE	Walldorf	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
55*	14	Storebrand ASA	Lysaker	1.5°C, SBTi, NZAM, NZAO	C+
55*	69	Sun Life Financial Inc	Toronto	NZAM	C+
56		Koninklijke Philips NV	Amsterdam	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
57	34	Arcelik AS	Istanbul	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
58		Citrix Systems Inc	Fort Lauderdale	SBTi	C+
59		UniCredit SpA	Milan	NZBA	C+
60	67	Commerzbank AG	Frankfurt am Main	SBTi, NZAM, NZBA	C+
61	37	ING Groep NV	Amsterdam	NZAM	C+
62		Quadient SA	Bagneux		C+
63	88	Henkel AG & Co KgaA	Düsseldorf	1.5°C, SBTi, NZAM	C+
64	59	Intel Corp	Santa Clara		C+
66†	77	Prologis Inc	San Francisco	SBTi	C+
67	65	Sanofi SA	Paris	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
68	74	Analog Devices Inc	Wilmington	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
69	87	Kesko Oyj	Helsinki	1.5°C, SBTi	C+
70	86	Nordea Bank Abp	Helsinki	NZAM, NZAO, NZBA	C+
71	44	National Australia Bank Ltd	Melbourne		C+
72	80	StarHub Ltd	Singapore		C+
73	92	Industria de Diseno Textil SA	Corunna	SBTi, FCCA	C+
74	91	Teck Resources Ltd	Vancouver		C
75	58	CapitaLand Investment Ltd	Singapore	SBTi	C
76	46	BNP Paribas SA	Paris	SBTi, NZAM, NZAO, NZBA	C
77		Puma SE	Herzogenaurach	SBTi, FCCA	C
78	79	Unilever PLC	London (U.K.)	1.5°C, SBTi	C
79		Gildan Activewear Inc	Montreal		C
80	47	Bank of Montreal	Montreal	NZAM, NZAO	C
81	68	Cogeco Communications Inc	Montreal	1.5°C, SBTi	C
82	76	Adidas AG	Herzogenaurach	SBTi, FCCA	C
83		Coloplast A/S	Humlebæk	1.5°C, SBTi	C
84	35	BT Group PLC	London (U.K.)	1.5°C, SBTi	C-
86†	73	Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd	Toronto		C-
87	78	Lenovo Group Ltd	Quarry Bay	SBTi	C-
88	42	Natura & Co Holding SA	São Paulo	1.5°C, SBTi	C-
89		Campbell Soup Co	Camden (U.S.)	SBTi	C-
90	56	Intesa Sanpaolo SpA	Turin	NZAM, NZAO, NZBA	C-
91	82	AstraZeneca PLC	Cambridge (U.K.)	1.5°C, SBTi	C-
92		KBC Groep NV	Brussels		C-
93	49	Allianz SE	Munich	SBTi, NZAM, NZAO	C-
94		Aster DM Healthcare Ltd	Dubai		D+
95	89	Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson	Stockholm	1.5°C, SBTi	D+
96	75	Pearson PLC	London (U.K.)	1.5°C, SBTi	D+
97		Biogen Inc	Cambridge (U.S.)	1.5°C, SBTi	D+
98	99	Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd	Toronto		D
99		LG Electronics Inc	Seoul	1.5°C, SBTi	D
100	94	Byd Co Ltd	Shenzhen		D-

* Tie
† Rank 30 and 85 updated due to data correction