The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a special report this past fall, saying we have until 2030 to cut global carbon emissions in half if we hope to sustain human life on this planet.

In Canada, the economic cost of climate breakdown has been estimated at $21 billion to $43 billion by 2050. The devastating impacts of extreme weather events are now all around us: from wildfires in British Columbia, to flooding in the Maritimes, to extreme heat waves in Quebec. In 2018 alone, the insured damages for severe weather events across the country were already $1.8 billion.

A newly released study commissioned by Environment and Climate Change Canada has underscored the overwhelming reality that here at home, we are not immune to the effects of a changing climate. Just the opposite, in fact: it’s now understood that Canada is warming at twice the global average.

And we need not look elsewhere to place blame. Canadians contribute more than their fair share of greenhouse gases. We’ve earned an embarrassing place in the top 10 global emitters, despite the fact we’re home to only 0.5% of the planet’s population. We’re actually the worst offender per capita among G7 countries, followed by the U.S., then Japan.

At the same time, we face a spate of interconnected crises: economic inequality, gaps in our healthcare system and household debt among them. We live in a time when 48% of Canadians are hovering on financial insolvency and the top 20% of Canadians control almost 70% of the wealth.

These challenges are aggravated by the climate crisis. For example, as crop yields decrease, food prices go up, and those already on the financial brink are pushed further to the margins.

The bottom line is that how we respond today will seal the fate of our natural ecosystems, economic prosperity and global security. We don’t have time to waste.

Many are now saying we need a “moonshot” – moving past Band-Aid solutions and towards more ambitious, comprehensive and bolder action to address the scale, scope and speed of the climate crisis. Greta Thunberg is a 16-year-old Swedish climate activist who inspired global school strikes with a lone climate strike last September. She bravely shared her fears at the World Economic Forum this past January in Davos:

“Our house is on fire. According to the IPCC, we are less than 12 years away from not being able to undo our mistakes.

On climate change, we have to acknowledge that we have failed.

But there is time to turn everything around. We can still fix this.

We must stop the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Either we do it or we don’t. Either we prevent a 1.5 degree of warming, or we don’t. Either we choose to go on as a civilization, or we don’t.

We must change almost everything in our current societies.

I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day.

And then I want you to act. I want you to act as if you would in a crisis. I want you to act as if the house was on fire. Because it is.”

So, the question becomes: What does it look like “to act as if the house was on fire”?

Thankfully, we have a historical precedent for this kind of decisive action, at the scale of the crises we face: the revolutionary New Deal in the United States. It was shaped by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) at a time when the Great Depression presented the greatest challenges the country had seen since the Civil War. His optimistic proposals were designed to produce three Rs: reduce poverty (“relief”), stimulate the economy (“recovery”) and stabilize the banking system (“reform”).

The question becomes:

What does it look like

“to act as if the house was on fire”?

Over the following years, the New Deal provided a coordinated series of actions that collectively kickstarted the American economy. It significantly increased gross national product and decreased the country’s previously crippling unemployment rates. While the measures were bold at the time, FDR continues to be categorized as one of the most important presidents in American history.

Fast forward almost 90 years and we have the opportunity to model our action today based on what worked for Roosevelt back then.

In the U.S., lawmakers led by Senator Ed Markey and House Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have put forward a Green New Deal resolution in Congress, and Democratic presidential hopefuls are jumping in to affirm their support.

They, too, see both the urgent opportunity and enormous costs of inaction.

In Canada, young people have largely been at the forefront of this conversation. In February, thousands met in Ottawa at an event called PowerShift to continue organizing. Now, supported by 350.org, they are championing a non-partisan campaign – “Our Time” – to mobilize an unprecedented youth vote to elect candidates who support a Green New Deal for Canada in the 2019 federal election.

We need to follow the leadership of these young people.

We can take this conversation to our kitchen tables, classrooms, corporate boardrooms and, ultimately, our Parliament, engaging people from across the political spectrum.

Because to refine what a Green New Deal for Canada could look like, we need to start a national conversation to guide it.

One that includes workers in affected industries, Indigenous communities, businesses, civil society groups and everyday people from all walks of life. Opinions have begun swirling on what could be included. Now the need is for coordination and strategy, and coalitions have begun to emerge: most recently a group of 65+ organizations across sectors and across the country have endorsed the Pact for a Green New Deal, together with dozens of luminary Canadians.

This can transform the current conversation in our country, one that is pitting those that support a price on carbon against those that support continued expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure – a failed dichotomy. Instead, let’s dream bigger.

Because we all want the same things: clean air, clean water, economic prosperity and a higher standard of living for all people in Canada.

Under a Green New Deal, the federal government would exercise a much wider range of policy tools to not only invest in the economy of the future, but to do so in a way that protects the people most directly affected by a dramatic transition.

While specifics are exactly what needs to be discussed over the next year, fundamental principles have begun to be put forward, for example by those that have endorsed the Pact for a Green New Deal:

1. It must meet the demands of Indigenous knowledge and science and cut Canada’s emissions in half in 11 years while protecting cultural and biological diversity.
2. It must leave no one behind and build a better present and future for all of us.

As we begin to dig in, modelled after that of the U.S., a Green New Deal for Canada could include:

• shifting to 100% zero-emission and renewable energy sources
• retrofitting all existing buildings to the highest energy efficiency standards
• building clean, affordable and accessible public transit, including high-speed rail
• building a more sustainable food system that ensures universal access to healthy food
• ensuring truly universal access to clean water and affordable housing
• skills retraining and a national jobs guarantee for private and public sector workers across the country.

In Waterloo Region for example, this means we would break ground on two-way, all-day, high-speed rail as part of the Metrolinx network. It means that as our community gentrifies, affordable housing would be guaranteed for all. And it means ensuring our land-use planning and infrastructure investments – from transit to energy to food – are decided with the next generation in mind.

In doing all this, across the country, a Green New Deal for Canada would both create thousands of high-wage jobs and provide solutions to so many other challenges we face in communities across the country. In the building sector alone, Corporate Knights estimates a Green New Deal would spur $20 billion in new investment, creating 233,000 additional jobs, while generating $54 billion in overall economic benefits per year by 2025.

In the building sector alone, Corporate Knights estimates a Green New Deal would spur $20 billion in new investment, creating 233,000 additional jobs, while generating $54 billion in overall economic benefits per year by 2025.

By co-creating this vision with Indigenous peoples, we can further reconciliation and ensure there is a place for everyone to share in the prosperity of the economy of tomorrow.

In the U.S., those making the case for a Green New Deal point out that necessary funding could flow from the considerable return on investment and wealth these projects would create. They are also open to opportunities for public and private partnerships, or contracting work, recognizing the scale of the challenges ahead.

In Canada, we could kickstart this shift with public money we’re currently using to subsidize the economy of the past. For example, if we started by ending current federal subsidies for domestic oil and gas producers, we would free up $16 billion over 10 years.

61% of Canadians

support a

“a massive government jobs program and investment in clean energy,

green technology, and electrification.

 

Now, this is our moment. So many have paved the way. Now, it’s on all of us to move this conversation to Parliament. To ensure our elected representatives bring us together to shape the specifics of a Green New Deal for Canada.

Polls suggest this could be a movement with broad support. This April, Abacus Data found that a majority of Canadians – 61% – support or somewhat support such a proposal, described as “a massive government jobs program and investment in clean energy, green technology, and electrification.” When asked how they feel about the plan if it requires “corporations and the wealthy” to pay higher taxes, support increased to 66%.

The key to our success will be how we engage previously and currently underrepresented groups to shape solutions for all, from Indigenous peoples to migrant communities to the precariously employed, to ensure they have a valuable place and will share in the transition.

Earlier this year, I decided to run for Parliament, because I believe we can dream bigger. We can rise to meet the challenges we face. And championing big ideas at the scale of the Green New Deal is one example of what this could look like.

Ultimately, this is not about left versus right. I don’t see taking action on the climate crisis as a partisan priority.

I see it as our responsibility to act in a way that respects the urgent calls we’ve received, from young people like Greta Thunberg to Indigenous leaders to climate scientists around the world.

And it’s in our collective best interest to act decisively, securing a bright future for generations to come.

Let’s get started.

Mike Morrice, founder of Green Economy Canada, is running to represent Kitchener-Centre in Parliament as a candidate with the Green Party of Canada.

The post Dreaming Bigger: A Green New Deal for Canada appeared first on Corporate Knights.

Interestingly, businesses and industry have taken less to the chorus of opposition towards this system. Instead, heavy economic hitters located in Ontario and globally have come out in support of a  shift toward carbon pricing policy, indicating that even some of the largest emitters are ready for action on climate change.  Indeed it is increasingly clear that those who oppose decisive action on climate change are on the wrong side of history. Climate change is both an enormous economic and ecological threat to Canada and the world. A raft of reports (see New Climate Economy, Deep Decarbonization Pathways, and Canada’s Ecofiscal Commission) demonstrate that acting on climate change would not only avert the economic and environmental costs of inaction, but offer huge benefits for the Canadian economy.

Fortunately here in Ontario these arguments for pricing carbon and acting on climate change are already familiar: the transition to a low-carbon economy has in fact already been getting underway in Ontario for years. Even before a carbon policy, businesses and organizations across diverse economic sectors have been quietly going about efforts to reduce their emissions, achieve carbon reduction goals and shift towards a low-carbon economy. CoLab is seeing this progress first-hand across the province: networks of businesses and organizations are working together, in both their individual and collective best interests, to reduce their carbon emissions and learn the value of engaging in sustainability.

In Waterloo Region, for example, more than 65 organizations representing nearly 15 per cent of the workforce have set targets to reduce their emissions equivalent to taking 12,000 cars off road through the Regional Carbon Initiative (RCI). Diverse sectors are represented in the RCI too– from manufacturing to retail, insurance to health care, and both social and public sectors. As they do so, they are switching to low-carbon products and services and realizing a positive return on their investment. For example, in 2013, five organizations that set GHG reduction targets in Waterloo Region spent $70,000 on energy audits, then $90,000 more on low-carbon projects identified in those audits. One of these – Conestoga Mall, owned by Ivanhoé Cambridge – has already met their 20 per cent carbon reduction target (five years early) and has now increased their target to 40 per cent by 2020.

Meanwhile, the Niagara Sustainability Initiative (NSI) is now working with 23 businesses committed to reducing over 6,000 tonnes of carbon pollution and Durham Sustain Ability has re-launched a program that already has 12 businesses committed to setting their own greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. Furthermore, organizations in Ottawa (EnviroCentre), Sudbury (reThink Green), Kingston (Sustainable Kingston) and York Region (Windfall Ecology Centre) are also following suit.

Add to all of this the province’s efforts to phase out coal, the increasing shift towards a higher percentage of renewable energy sources, and the rise of Ontario’s cleantech sector: the concerted move to decouple emissions from the economy is becoming all the more clear. Why are these organizations and businesses doing all of this? CoLab believes that, both individually and collectively, businesses, organizations, and governments have come to the conclusion that they can do both well and good.  Moving forward, as Ontario’s new carbon-pricing policy unfolds, let us learn from those who are leading the way towards a low-carbon future. Rather than revisiting stale debates about what the merits are of acting now, let’s focus the conversation on how to best accelerate the transition already underway.

To continue the dialogue and hear from Canada’s leading voices on the low-carbon economy, register for CoLab Connects 2015, an evening to celebrate the progress of CoLab’s Network and spark conversation on how we can accelerate a cleaner economy in Ontario. The reception will be held on June 17^th from 6:30-9pm at Wychwood Barns in Toronto.

The post A funny thing happened on the way to the climate summit appeared first on Corporate Knights.

It turns out, the officer pulled me over for obstructing traffic. I had been riding in the middle of the right lane on a four-lane road. The officer recommended that if I don’t feel safe riding next to the curb, I should instead ride on the sidewalk. As a cyclist, he said, he does the same. We had a 20-minute conversation, and by the end, the officer decided not to charge or warn me with anything.  I’ll spare you the details, but I later found out that the legitimacy of the officer’s concern rests on clause 147.1 of the Highway Traffic Act, which determines whether someone is riding with “practicable” space.

But this is not an article about the innards of the Highway Traffic Act. The officer and I agreed that roads should be designed for a more diverse set of users. And while the majority of urban planners would agree – and are already designing more complete streets – there is an underlying point that is rarely discussed: building a bike lane is not just about creating space for a particular road user, it is about improving the experience of all road users. When a bike lane is built, cyclists no longer slow down cars and, as a result, traffic flows better and more safely for all.

In my experience, I’ve found that when marginalized groups’ interests are considered, conditions for the existing majority can also be improved.  Often, it’s ideology that gets in the way, holding us back from seeing that some of our toughest challenges – whether related to urban planning, health care or income inequality –have solutions that can benefit everyone involved.

This understanding is part of how I encourage community organizations to go about engaging businesses in sustainability action. Their purpose is not simply to reduce business’ carbon footprints; it is also about increasing the profitability of the business, engaging and attracting superstar employees and creating economic opportunities for low-carbon products and services. When businesses set targets to reduce their carbon impacts, everyone benefits.

Returning to transportation, the days of talking about “the war on cars” should be long over. This ideological rhetoric makes good headlines but erodes meaningful conversation. For better or worse, Canadian cities in the 20^th century were built and retrofitted around the fancy invention of their time – the car. But Canadians are changing their transportation choices. And as more policies and infrastructure are built to welcome all users, existing users should cheer along with them because we’re all better off as a result.

In the meantime, while cyclists are stuck sharing infrastructure that was built for bigger and faster motorists, maybe we can all compensate for this lack of foresight with a surge in patience and camaraderie. This, too, is in all of our best interests.

Mike Morrice founded Sustainable Waterloo Region (SWR) and served as the organization’s executive director until January 2014. He now leads Sustainability CoLab, a national non-profit created to help community organizations launch and grow target-based sustainability programs similar to the one piloted at SWR. You can follow him at @CoLabMike and Sustainability CoLab at @SustainCoLab.

The post Not another article about bike lanes appeared first on Corporate Knights.