On that first meeting, we had dinner in downtown Toronto: me, my wife, Toby Heaps, Karen Kun (then with Corporate Knights), and Jim and Sandy. Jim was 88 years old; my wife warned me to “keep the conversation light,” as Jim was older and I should not exhaust him. I agreed. 

Then we had dinner. I sat opposite Jim, and as Toby will often recall, Jim and I barely noticed those at our table or in the restaurant for the next four hours. The “conversation light” pact went out the window. As I recall, we covered topics ranging from evolutionary biology, world energy supply, behavioural economics, climate change to, ultimately, global carrying capacity. Sitting across from Jim, more than once I reminded myself that I was speaking with arguably the best-informed person on the planet who truly understood global challenges. At times, I wondered if I was holding up my end of the conversation, which I was probably not, yet Jim indulged me and showed no signs of wanting to lighten things up. 

I spent about a week with Jim and Sandy on their first trip to Toronto, and we became instant friends. During this visit, Jim convinced me that climate change was irreversible (mitigating greenhouse gases would only slow things down) and that we needed to prepare for pending extreme weather risks. Jim’s guidance caused me to switch careers, to focus on climate adaptation. 

From our initial meeting 14 years ago, on an annual or semi-annual basis I would travel to meet with Jim and Sandy at their house. On these one-day pilgrimages, we would spend two to three hours in the morning talking about global issues, break for lunch, and then resume our discussion for another two hours. I would then leave, and Jim would have a sleep – he was now in his 90s. 

I would prepare for weeks for our discussions that were, and remain, the highlights of my professional life. When sitting with Jim in his living room, I always knew that I was meeting with the equivalent of today’s Charles Darwin, in the sense that through his Gaia theory he redefined how to interpret the biological and physical world around us. 

The sphere of Jim’s influence sometimes crept into our conversations, while I attempted to keep cool. Once, he told me of a young undergraduate student who came to his office to discuss the damage pollutants may cause to ecosystems; the student was an unknown Rachel Carson. Another time, he mentioned a young astronomer he had helped, who he said turned out to be a good communicator; he asked me if I knew Carl Sagan. These innocuous mentions would pop up in our conversations, and I knew I had a privileged front-row seat. 

The world needs more Jim Lovelocks. There is a void with his loss, but we have his writings. When he sent me an early copy of his book A Rough Ride to the Future, he wrote below the title, in his best steady hand, “But not if you adapt!” I always have that book on my desk. 

Blair Feltmate is the head of the Intact Centre on Climate Adaptation at the University of Waterloo.

The post The world needs more James Lovelocks appeared first on Corporate Knights.

As foreboding as this sounds, it is even more lamentable that flooding knows no geographic bias, with homeowners from Halifax to Victoria bearing the costs of flooding first hand. In short, there is no safe zone when it comes to the potential for residential flooding in Canada.

More specifically, as documented by the Insurance Bureau of Canada, property and casualty insurable losses jumped from an average of $405 million per year between 1983 and 2008, to an average of $1.8 billion per year from 2009 to 2017 (with data normalized for inflation and per-capita wealth accumulation). Flooding contributed more to this increase than any other factor. With this increasing risk, a new phenomenon has emerged in Canada beginning circa 2016 – growth in the un-insurability of the residential housing market. The percentage of homes across Canada that are uninsurable has not been quantified, as the number is dynamic and growing.

Additionally, with many Canadians struggling to meet their financial obligations, homeowners with limited insurance coverage could find themselves in mortgage arrears in the event of a flood. The average restoration cost of basement flooding in Canada is $43,000, which is compounded by an average of seven lost person-days from work per affected household. The Canadian Payroll Association reported that as of 2017, 47 per cent of Canadians would find it difficult to meet their financial obligations if their pay cheque was delayed for one week, thus suggesting that basement flooding, in the absence of adequate insurance, could result in homeowners not able to meet scheduled mortgage payments. One of Canada’s largest banks is currently tracking for spikes in mortgage defaults, following floods, in cities where insurance coverage has been reduced in recent years.

In light of flooding being Canada’s most formidable and growing climate challenge, the question so many homeowners are asking themselves is, “What, if anything, can I do to avoid a flooded basement?” Fortunately, there are a number of actions that can be engaged around a home to limit flood risk, at minimal cost with a positive return and that do not require special expertise. Despite this optimism, it is important to bear in mind that limiting risk is not the same as eliminating risk. If Noah’s flood hits, most houses will flood despite all pre-emptive actions.

Outside the home

Outside of the home, at the lot level, there are four simple steps that are often overlooked by homeowners that can limit the probability of water entering into a basement:

• Once in the spring and once in the fall, and following any major wind storm, leaves should be swept away from storm drains, which allows water to drain without restraint.

• During a major storm, homeowners should inspect their property for water pooling close to the foundation. Post storm, these areas of depression should be filled and graded to direct water away from the foundation.

• In the fall, after trees shed their leaves, eaves should be cleaned. Additionally, if downspouts drain into the weeping tile system, they should be disconnected, extensions added, and water should be directed to a safe discharge location two metres from the foundation.

• Plastic covers should be placed over window wells, thus allowing light to enter, but preventing water from filling the window well during major storms. Where possible, windows at grade level should be water tight.

Inside the basement

In the event that water does enter the basement, several precautionary steps can be taken to limit potential damage:

• Prior to a storm, sump pumps should be tested to ensure they have not seized and that they discharge water – this can be accomplished by pouring a bucket of water in the sump well. Additionally, because power often goes out during major storms, a back-up battery that can power a pump for up to 72 hours should be installed.

• A qualified plumber should inspect the water drainage line in the basement to determine if a backwater valve is required to limit water from backing up through the sewer system into the basement. Also, if a backwater valve is installed, it should be cleaned twice a year to ensure it seals properly – cleaning requires less than 15 minutes.

• Importantly, basement floor drains should be checked to ensure they are not blocked by obstructions.

• Finally, valuables and mementos should be stored in waterproof containers, at least a metre above the basement floor, to ensure they are not subject to water damage.

The extra mile

The return on investment for strong flood risk protection is high.

If you took 1,000 homes, put the average cost of flood protection actions per house at $500 (downspout extensions, plastic covers for window wells, sump pump, battery back-up for sump pump), the cost of protecting those homes would be $500,000.

Assume now that five per cent of homes that received that protection don’t flood over a period of 10 years. If you use the Insurance Bureau of Canada’s figure of $43,000 for the average cost of basement flood damage, the avoided cost for that non-flooded group of 50 homes would be $2,150,000. That creates a cost to benefit ratio of 1 to 4.3 ($500,000/2,150,000).

Otherwise stated, for every $1 spent on flood protection, the savings per 10-year period, per household, would equal $4.30.

That’s a big savings for individual homeowners, insurers, the housing market and Canadian society as a whole.

Also, given that even the least capable handyman could install the above equipment, the installation costs for flood protection equipment would be negligible or non-existent for most homeowners.

These kinds of steps will save homeowners money when it comes time to buy insurance. Large property and casualty insurers, such as Intact Financial, have said that by taking these steps, “Canadians could lower their annual premiums – anywhere from 5 to 15 per cent.”

Going forward

For homeowners who wish to do even more, a new option will soon be available.

In September 2018, Seneca College in Toronto launched Canada’s first college level training program in home flood risk assessment. The primary audience for this 14-week course is home inspectors, followed by municipal planners, builders, developers, landscape designers and, effectively, anyone interested in residential flood risk prevention. In January 2019, the course will be available on-line, thus making it accessible Canada-wide to thousands of home inspectors.

Going forward, homeowners should seek home inspectors with certification in home flood risk assessment. Over the next few years, as graduates from the course grow in number, all homes that go on the market should be subject to an assessment review and remediation. No one should buy a home without a thorough assessment performed by a qualified practitioner.

For many Canadians, their home is their primary investment vehicle and, ultimately, their retirement fund. Every homeowner should, at a minimum, implement the eight simple actions described above as a first line of defence against basement flooding, and every mayor and councillor should support a door-to-door campaign in communities to introduce homeowners to these steps.

These actions will not only serve the financial interests of homeowners and communities in the near term, but also position Canada to stop chasing climate change and to get ahead of the bigger floods that are yet to come.

The post Before the storm appeared first on Corporate Knights.